Members of the House of Representatives, Wednesday
opposed the proposed bill which seeks to provide monetary incentives to
unemployed graduates across the country.
Arua Arunsi,
sponsored the bill for an Act to amend the National Directorate of Employment (NDE)
laws, 2004 by creating by creating specific functions and objectives to
specifically cater for unemployed graduates of tertiary institutions failed to
scale second reading as it was rejected by voice vote.
The bill also
seeks to pay certain amount of allowance to the unemployed graduates in
Nigeria; design and implementation of programmes to combat mass unemployment
for graduates that are between the ages of 18 to 35 years and also between
third to fifth year of post graduation experience.
Some of the lawmakers
who favoured the passage ofthe bill include Fort Dike, Hassan El-Badawy, Peace
Nnaji, among others supported the bill noted that the country can afford to
give the monthly allowance to the unemployed youth.
Other
lawmakers who spoke against the passage of the bill include James Faleke,
Ibrahim El-Sudi, Essien Ayi, chairman, House Committee on Labour and
Productivity, Peter Onyemaechi, among others.
For James
Faleke argued that provision of such monetary incentive would further compound
the economy challenges facing the country.
According to
him, since the Nigerian economy was not production-based, industrial revival
efforts would be defeated, “Rather than turn our unemployed youths into lazy
ones, government should channel the monthly stipends towards the revival of our
industries.
“In other
words, lets teach them how to fish instead of giving them the fish. When our
industries are revived, the economy will be able to a absorb them.
However, the
antagonists of the bill pointed out that the provisions of the bill failed to
meet critical criterium of filling gaps inherent in the existing laws it
was seeking to amend.
Ibrahim
El-Sudi noted the bill has nothing new as a similar programme for unemployed
graduates was already in existence at the NDE saying, “There is a
graduate attachment programme that does exactly what this bill is seeking
“Even, a
similar programme is existing for non-graduates on the social aspect for
unemployed non-graduates at the NISTF. What should happen is for the
authorities to strengthen these Programmes”.
In his view,
Peter Onyemaechi expressed concern over the programme which he said could be
compromised, citing previous poverty alleviation programmes that have failed.
“How do we
verify the beneficiaries abducted how do they qualify, because of corruption,
the list would just keep expanding. People would no longer look for work since
there is easy money coming in every month ” he added.
Chairman,
Committee on Labour, Employment and Productivity Essien Ayi, who also
opposed the bill, argued that there was no need for the bill as an earlier bill
on National Social Insurance Trust Find (NSITF) has already addressed the issue
stipends and if this should scale through, it would disallow the organization
from carrying out its duties.
They also
faulted opinions that the stipends would turn the beneficiaries into lazy
youths.
While they
argued that the monthly stipends would only serve as motivation as well as keep
them out of mischief, the protagonists of the bill noted that such gesture
would keep the youths from restiveness and other vices.
However,
faulty public address system halted the debate midway send the Speaker, Aminu
Tambuwal was forced to put the bill to voice vote using his campaign voice.
No comments:
Post a Comment